Rahul Gandhi summoned by UP court in defamation matter
UP court calls Rahul Gandhi to appear on January 19 in Amit Shah defamation case

Rahul Gandhi summoned by UP court in defamation matter

UP court calls Rahul Gandhi to appear on January 19 in Amit Shah defamation case

Rahul Gandhi, the Congress leader and Member of Parliament, has been summoned by a court in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, in a defamation case related to Union Home Minister Amit Shah. The case was filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra and has been ongoing for over seven years. The court has asked Rahul Gandhi to appear on January 19 for further proceedings.

The defamation suit was filed in October 2018. Vijay Mishra, a resident of Hanuman Ganj in Kotwali Dehat, claimed that Rahul Gandhi made objectionable remarks against Amit Shah during the Karnataka assembly election campaign in August 2018. At that time, Rahul had allegedly said that the party president, who talks about honesty, is accused of murder. These remarks prompted Vijay Mishra to file a legal complaint in Sultanpur.

The case has been ongoing for a long time. In December 2023, a warrant was issued against Rahul Gandhi when he failed to appear in court. Later, on February 20, 2024, he surrendered before the special judge and was granted bail on two bonds of Rs 25,000 each. On July 26, 2024, Rahul Gandhi recorded his statement in court, claiming that he was innocent and describing the case as a political conspiracy.

Witnesses cross-examined, court sets next date

The court proceedings resumed recently, and Rahul Gandhi’s advocate, Kashi Prasad Shukla, completed the cross-examination of witness Ram Chandra Dubey. The plaintiff’s advocate, Santosh Kumar Pandey, confirmed that the cross-examination of the witness was complete. After this, the court set January 19 as the date for further proceedings, when Rahul Gandhi will be required to appear in person.

This defamation case has seen a slow but steady process over the years. After Rahul Gandhi recorded his statement, the court asked the plaintiff to present evidence. Witnesses have been called one by one, and their statements have been examined. Until now, only one witness had been cross-examined, and the cross-examination of the second witness, Ram Chandra Dubey, has just been completed.

ALSO READ: India’s airport expansion is reshaping the country’s real estate landscape

ALSO READ: US detains Venezuela’s President Maduro, raising questions over impact on Ukraine war and Taiwan tensions

The legal process has been lengthy because the remarks were made during the Karnataka assembly elections in 2018, and the case involves detailed examination of evidence and witness testimonies. Despite the delay, the court continues to hear the case and has now moved closer to concluding the proceedings.

Rahul Gandhi, who is the Leader of Opposition in India’s Parliament, is expected to present his side of the case in detail when he appears on January 19. The court will examine all evidence and witness statements before making further decisions. The case highlights the legal consequences of political statements and the role of defamation law in India.

Vijay Mishra’s complaint is based on the claim that Rahul Gandhi’s remarks harmed the reputation of Amit Shah. Defamation cases in India can be filed when a person believes that someone has made false or damaging statements about them. The aim of the law is to protect personal and public reputation. In this case, the court is examining whether Rahul Gandhi’s comments fall under defamation and whether they caused damage to the complainant or the political figure mentioned.

The proceedings so far show that both sides are presenting evidence carefully. Rahul Gandhi’s legal team has been cross-examining witnesses to challenge their statements. Similarly, the plaintiff’s side has presented evidence to support the claim of defamation. Courts in India follow a detailed process in such cases, including recording statements, examining witnesses, and reviewing evidence before reaching a conclusion.

Political defamation cases like this one often attract public attention because they involve well-known leaders and sensitive statements. This case has been followed closely by media and political observers because it connects to remarks made during election campaigns, which can influence public opinion. The court’s handling of the case shows the importance of the rule of law in India, where even high-profile politicians are required to answer legal complaints.

In conclusion, Rahul Gandhi has been summoned by the Sultanpur court in Uttar Pradesh to appear on January 19 in a defamation case filed by BJP leader Vijay Mishra. The case relates to remarks made about Amit Shah during the Karnataka assembly elections in 2018. The cross-examination of witness Ram Chandra Dubey has been completed, and the court will now proceed with further hearings. The case, which has been ongoing for over seven years, continues to draw attention due to the political and legal significance of the matter.

The upcoming court date will be important for Rahul Gandhi to present his side and for the court to review all remaining evidence. Both sides are carefully preparing for the proceedings, and the legal process will determine whether the remarks made during the 2018 election campaign constitute defamation under Indian law.

 


Comment As:

Comment (0)