Dhurandhar proves India can handle the truth without burning a bus

The movie Dhurandhar has sparked discussions about how India deals with its history and the truth. For decades, the Indian public was often shielded from harsh realities of the past. Intellectuals and policymakers believed that telling people the full truth could provoke unrest, so they created a system that controlled what history was taught. Now, films like Dhurandhar show that India can face difficult truths without causing chaos.

The story begins with a reflection on past events in Mumbai. On a Friday afternoon, multiple bomb blasts shook the city, killing hundreds of people. Officials at the time took steps to prevent communal riots. For instance, they invented the idea of a “13th blast” in a different area to calm tensions. These actions were praised by commissions and became part of the official narrative. Truth was often adjusted to prevent public unrest. This approach created a culture where certain truths were hidden, and the public only learned selective history.

The public can handle truth without chaos.

Historically, Indian students were taught a version of history that avoided uncomfortable facts. The first generation of academic leaders understood the consequences of full disclosure, but later generations often lacked this awareness. Textbooks and cultural narratives emphasized certain historical figures and events while ignoring others. People grew up valuing movies, TV shows, and art that presented a selective version of history. For decades, the popular narrative suggested that exposing the public to real historical injustices might lead to violence—“What if they burn a bus?” became a metaphor for controlling public reaction.

This mindset also influenced intellectuals and critics. Many dismissed films like Dhurandhar as propaganda because they touched on politically sensitive topics. Yet, these films explore historical truths that were previously avoided. The movie celebrates the idea of India responding to historical injustices, reflecting a post-2014 sense of national pride. Characters in the film discuss a prophecy about a time when India could stand up for itself, which resonates with viewers who feel connected to these historical narratives.

The political context is also significant. The movie indirectly acknowledges the achievements of the current government, showing that the public’s desire for justice and historical recognition has real-world consequences, including at the polls. The masses, previously protected from the harsh realities of history, are now accessing information beyond their school textbooks. They are engaging with history more critically and independently, learning about events and figures that were once ignored or glossed over.

ALSO READ: Why your air fryer might be working against your health, Mumbai doctor explains

ALSO READ:  Bird flu outbreak in Kerala: Causes, risks, symptoms, treatment and what you need to know

Filmmakers are helping India face its history honestly.

The success of Dhurandhar follows the trend set by films like The Kashmir Files, which tackled politically sensitive subjects. These movies demonstrate that there is a market for historical truth. The economics of filmmaking, combined with skilled direction and sufficient funding, allows directors like Aditya Dhar to tell stories that challenge old narratives. This approach also encourages more talented filmmakers to step outside the constraints of the traditional curriculum and present history without “honourable lies.”

Indian society has shown that it can process historical truths responsibly. Unlike the fears of earlier generations, revealing uncomfortable facts does not necessarily lead to chaos. The secular fabric of India, rooted in centuries of civilizational values, can withstand honest discussions about history. Films like Dhurandhar contribute to a broader understanding of the past while remaining commercially and socially viable.

The cultural shift is significant. Whereas previous generations were trained to avoid politically sensitive topics, today’s filmmakers and audiences are ready to confront history with maturity. They are questioning official narratives, exploring hidden truths, and engaging with history beyond textbooks. This engagement is essential for a healthy democracy, where citizens are aware of their past and capable of critical thinking.

In conclusion, Dhurandhar is more than just a movie—it is a symbol of how India is learning to handle truth responsibly. For decades, the country relied on selective history to maintain social order. Today, however, it is clear that the public can engage with historical realities without resorting to violence. Filmmakers are playing a crucial role in this shift, using their platforms to educate and inspire. India can indeed handle the truth without burning a bus, and this marks a new era in how the nation understands its past.