Stray dogs and public safety
Balancing safety and care: protecting stray dogs and people alike
India faces a growing challenge with stray dogs roaming streets and occasionally attacking people. Recent media reports highlighted a boy being mauled by stray dogs in Delhi, prompting the Supreme Court to take suo motu action on August 11, 2025. A two-member bench initially ordered the removal of stray dogs from Delhi’s streets, but strong protests from animal activists led to the case being referred to a three-member bench for a fresh hearing from August 14.
The Chief Justice of India emphasized the importance of executing the order despite opposition. Delhi has a few sterilization centers for stray dogs, but these are not rescue centers like those in the United States. The scale of the problem is enormous, with over two lakh stray dogs in the capital region alone. While sterilization can control the population, it does not prevent already aggressive dogs from attacking pedestrians. Safety for humans must be ensured while addressing animal welfare concerns.
Need for stricter management of stray dogs
Stray dogs in India create both public health and safety issues. Many people attempt to justify the presence of stray dogs, claiming they act as scavengers. However, human lives cannot be treated as equal to the convenience of stray animals. Returning sterilized dogs to streets only reduces future population growth; it does not prevent attacks on unsuspecting pedestrians. In countries like the United States, dogs are controlled carefully. Pet owners are responsible for leashing their dogs, cleaning up after them, and ensuring they do not harm anyone. Violations can result in penalties or even euthanasia for aggressive dogs.
In India, the situation is very different. Many domestic pets are allowed to roam freely, sometimes attacking passersby. Stray dogs are often fed and tolerated as night-time “watchdogs” in apartment complexes, which reduces human vigilance but increases risks for others. This informal arrangement shows a lack of structured animal management and accountability. There is an urgent need for stricter regulations, both for pets and stray dogs, to protect public safety.
Animal welfare must go hand in hand with human safety. Until sufficient rescue centers and adoption programs are established, NGOs and animal lovers should step in to adopt stray dogs. Adoption can provide safe homes for these animals and reduce the pressure on public streets. Some adopters may even use breeding programs to maintain healthy populations of certain dog breeds, which could be supported by tax incentives from the government.
Learning from global examples
Civilized countries balance animal welfare with public safety effectively. In Switzerland, dog owners must ensure their pets are visible at night to avoid accidents. In the United States, abandoned dogs are housed in rescue centers and later adopted by families. Responsible pet ownership is a cornerstone of safety, with strict enforcement for aggressive animals. India, however, has allowed stray dogs to multiply unchecked, creating a dangerous environment for pedestrians.
The Supreme Court’s initiative is an opportunity to implement a long-term strategy for managing stray dogs. It is a litmus test for the three arms of government: legislature, executive, and judiciary. Effective action now will set a precedent for handling animal welfare and public safety in urban India. Proper measures should include sterilization programs, establishment of rescue centers, adoption campaigns, and strict enforcement of pet ownership rules.
ALSO READ: PM Modi’s speech signals strong counteroffensive in demographic battle
Alongside managing stray dogs, the government should also enforce cleanliness regulations for domestic pets. Owners must clean up after their dogs to maintain public hygiene and prevent disease. Such rules are common in many countries, where strict fines and penalties ensure compliance. India can adapt similar policies while encouraging responsible pet ownership and creating incentives for adoption.
In conclusion, India must find a balance between protecting stray dogs and ensuring pedestrian safety. Humane treatment of animals is important, but it cannot come at the cost of human lives. The Supreme Court’s actions in Delhi are a first step toward creating a safer environment. By combining sterilization, adoption programs, responsible ownership, and strict enforcement, India can protect both its citizens and its stray dogs.
This approach will not only reduce the risk of attacks but also improve public hygiene and overall quality of urban life. The challenge is large, but with coordinated effort from the government, NGOs, and citizens, India can develop a sustainable solution that respects both human and animal welfare.
