7/11 verdict raises tough questions about India’s criminal justice system

It’s been nearly 20 years since the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts killed over 180 people and injured more than 800. After a long investigation and trial, 12 people were convicted in 2015. But now, in a shocking move, the Bombay High Court has acquitted all of them, saying the evidence wasn’t strong enough.

The High Court said the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. It pointed out problems like weak eyewitness accounts, delays in identification, and doubts about whether confessions were truly voluntary.

But many are asking: how could two courts see the same evidence and come to such different conclusions? The lower court gave death and life sentences. The High Court said the case wasn’t proved at all.

This raises serious concerns about the reliability and consistency of India’s criminal justice system. If the courts can’t agree on such a big case, how can people trust the system?

Justice must work with national security

The release of the 12 accused is not just a legal issue—it’s also a national security concern. These were people linked to known terrorist groups. Letting them go free raises fears that they could reconnect with dangerous networks and plan more attacks.

The verdict has hurt public trust. Victims’ families feel justice has not been done. Many people are frustrated and angry, questioning whether India is too soft on terror. This kind of frustration can lead to dangerous thinking—like turning to mob justice or media trials—where emotion replaces law.

It also sends the wrong message globally. India has tried to show it is strong against terrorism, with actions like the Balakot strikes. But this verdict may make the country look weak when it comes to punishing those responsible for major attacks.

For police and anti-terror agencies, this outcome is demoralising. They risk their lives during investigations, often working in tough conditions. When their efforts are thrown out in court, it weakens their morale and could discourage future work.

This doesn’t mean we should ignore rules or deny fair trials. But in cases of terrorism, the courts need to balance civil rights with the country’s safety. Judges must understand that national security and justice are connected. A purely technical or narrow approach might allow dangerous people to walk free.

Reform is urgent and overdue

This case has shown that India’s legal system, built on colonial-era laws, is not equipped for modern terrorism. Today’s terrorists use encrypted apps and high-tech tools, but our system still relies heavily on old-style evidence like eyewitnesses or signed confessions.

We need urgent reforms. That includes training judges, prosecutors, and police officers to handle modern evidence, like digital data and cross-border communication. Witness protection is also crucial, especially in terror cases where witnesses are often threatened.

Laws like UAPA and MCOCA have been updated to deal with new-age crime, but if courts don’t evolve with them, justice will suffer. Delays, inconsistency, and outside influence continue to affect court outcomes.

ALSO READ: The ultimate guide to help you stay consistent with workouts this monsoon season

ALSO READ: Is voter roll cleanup fair or targeting eastern Bihar?

Even within the legal community, concerns are rising. The fact that a former Chief Justice acted as a lawyer for two of the accused in this case has sparked debate. While everyone has the right to legal help, some say high-level involvement in such sensitive cases could influence how the case is seen by the court or public.

The Supreme Court has now stayed the High Court’s acquittals and will review the case. This gives India one last chance to show that justice matters—not just in law, but in real life.

Justice must not stand alone

Justice must be fair, but it must also be effective. In a case that took nearly 20 years, where over 180 lives were lost, finding no one guilty raises serious doubts. Can a justice system that delivers such a result be considered successful?

India must now make sure its criminal justice system is not just independent, but modern, aware, and ready to handle the country’s biggest threats—including terrorism.

The 7/11 case is more than a verdict—it’s a test of India’s strength as a democracy. The time to fix the system is now.