News Headlines, English News, Today Headlines, Top Stories | Arth Parkash
Trump turns down Putin’s plan to store Iran’s enriched uranium in Russia Donald Trump rejects Vladimir Putin proposal to move Iran’s enriched uranium to Russia
Saturday, 14 Mar 2026 00:00 am
News Headlines, English News, Today Headlines, Top Stories | Arth Parkash

News Headlines, English News, Today Headlines, Top Stories | Arth Parkash

A proposal by Russian President Vladimir Putin to move Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile to Russia has reportedly been rejected by United States President Donald Trump. The suggestion was discussed during a phone conversation between the two leaders earlier this week. According to reports, the idea was presented as part of a possible diplomatic effort to reduce tensions in the ongoing conflict involving Iran, the United States, and its regional allies.

Reports said the discussion focused on Iran’s growing uranium stockpile, which has become one of the most sensitive issues in the crisis. The proposal reportedly suggested that Iran’s enriched uranium could be transported to Russia, where it would be stored under strict supervision. Supporters of the idea believed such a move could help lower tensions and reduce the immediate risk of nuclear escalation.

However, the report said Trump did not agree with the proposal. Sources familiar with the conversation indicated that the US administration remains focused on ensuring that Iran’s uranium stockpile is fully secured in a way that prevents any possibility of it being used for nuclear weapons. The United States has repeatedly stressed that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons capability.

The dispute mainly revolves around about 450 kilograms of uranium enriched to around 60 percent purity. Experts say uranium enriched to this level can be converted to weapons-grade uranium relatively quickly. Weapons-grade uranium typically requires enrichment levels of around 90 percent.

According to nuclear experts quoted in various reports, Iran’s current stockpile could potentially be further enriched within weeks if the necessary technical steps were taken. This has raised concerns among international observers and governments that closely monitor nuclear proliferation.

Reports also said the amount of uranium involved could theoretically be enough to produce more than ten nuclear bombs if enriched further. Because of this possibility, securing or neutralising the stockpile has become a key objective for both the United States and its close ally Israel.

For Washington, preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons capability remains a major strategic goal. Israel has also repeatedly warned that it considers Iran’s nuclear programme a serious security threat and has said it is prepared to take strong action if necessary.

Russia’s role in nuclear diplomacy

The suggestion to move Iran’s uranium to Russia was partly based on Moscow’s technical capability to safely store nuclear materials. Russia is one of the world’s major nuclear powers and has extensive infrastructure for handling and securing enriched uranium.

Because of these capabilities, Russia has previously been involved in international nuclear agreements and storage arrangements. One example was the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the major nuclear deal reached in 2015 between Iran and several world powers.

Under that agreement, Iran agreed to limit its nuclear programme and reduce its uranium stockpile. In return, international sanctions against Iran were lifted. As part of the arrangement, some of Iran’s low-enriched uranium was transferred to Russia for storage.

ALSO READ: Israel launches ‘bomb shelter dating’ app during Iran war, sparks online backlash

ALSO READ: Oil Prices Surge as Iran-Israel War Disrupts Global Energy Supply

Supporters of the new proposal reportedly believed a similar approach might help reduce tensions again. By transferring the enriched uranium to Russia, Iran would temporarily remove the material from its own territory. This could reduce the immediate risk of the uranium being quickly enriched to weapons-grade levels.

However, the situation today is very different from the diplomatic environment that existed when the 2015 agreement was signed. Relations between major global powers have become far more complicated, and trust between countries involved in nuclear negotiations has weakened in recent years.

Reports also suggest that Russia had previously raised similar proposals during earlier discussions related to Iran’s nuclear programme. According to sources cited in reports, Moscow mentioned the idea during US-Iran nuclear negotiations in May and again shortly before the latest tensions began.

Despite these repeated suggestions, the latest reports indicate that the United States remains cautious about any plan involving the transfer of such sensitive nuclear material. American officials reportedly want stronger guarantees that Iran’s uranium stockpile will be fully secured and kept out of any potential weapons programme.

At the same time, diplomatic efforts to reduce tensions in the region are continuing. Several countries are believed to be exploring possible solutions that could prevent further escalation while also addressing concerns about Iran’s nuclear activities.

The uranium issue has become one of the central points in the broader conflict involving Iran, the United States, and regional powers. Any decision about how to manage the stockpile could have major consequences for global security and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.

For now, reports indicate that Trump’s rejection of Putin’s proposal means that the idea of transferring Iran’s uranium to Russia is unlikely to move forward in the near future. However, experts say diplomatic negotiations on the issue are likely to continue as governments search for ways to prevent the crisis from worsening.